CE Plus · Test case 5

Cyber Essentials Plus Test 5: account separation

How the Cyber Essentials Plus assessor tests that standard user accounts do not hold administrator privileges: a logged-in user attempts an administrative process and must be prompted for separate credentials on every sampled device.

By Precursor Security, an IASME Certification BodyUpdated 22 September 2026
Short answer

Test case 5 of Cyber Essentials Plus checks that day-to-day user accounts do not have administrator privileges. On every sampled device the logged-in standard user attempts to run a defined administrative process. If they are prompted for an additional login and the process does not run under their own account, the device passes; otherwise it fails.

Key facts
Test purpose
Applies to
Method
Pass rule
Requirement
Control tested

What does Test 5 check?

Test 5 checks that a standard user account cannot run an administrative task without being prompted for a separate login, so that the process does not run with the user's own account.

The requirements say you must use separate accounts to perform administrative activities only, with no emailing, web browsing or other standard activity on them. The reason is in the requirements' own example: malware runs with the privilege of the account that opened it, and an administrator opening a malicious attachment lets ransomware encrypt far more than a standard user could.

A7.6 and A7.7 ask how you ensure separation and how you prevent administrator accounts being used for everyday tasks. Test 5 checks the first half on every sampled device.

Cyber Essentials Plus Test Specification v3.2

When logged in with a standard user account, they attempt to run a defined administrative process. All sampled devices need to be tested. Observe a user attempting to run an administration process for the particular sampled operating systems with the current logged in account. Repeat the test on every sampled device in the audit. If the test results in the user being prompted for an additional login and the process does not run using the user account details, then award a Pass. Otherwise, award a Fail.

What administrative process is attempted?

The assessor attempts any action that needs administrator rights from the sampled user's account. The specification does not prescribe which action.

The specification leaves the exact process to the assessor and the operating system. The intent is an action that requires elevated rights, so that the outcome shows whether the current account holds them.

PlatformTypical actionPass looks like
WindowsOpen an elevated command prompt, install software, or change a system setting behind User Account ControlA prompt for a different administrator username and password; entering the user's own credentials is refused
macOSUnlock a System Settings pane or install a packageA prompt for an administrator name and password that the user does not have
Linux desktopRun a command with sudoThe user is not in sudoers, or a separate admin account is required
Cloud console (for example Microsoft 365 admin, AWS)Open an administrative portal or change a tenant setting as the normal userAccess denied, or a separate privileged account is required
MobileChange a managed setting or remove managementBlocked by the MDM profile

Why is a UAC prompt alone not enough?

A UAC prompt alone is not enough because the pass condition also requires that the process does not run using the user's own account details. A Yes button on an account that is already an administrator fails.

The pass condition has two parts: the user is prompted for an additional login, and the process does not run using the user's own account details. A Windows account that is a local administrator will see a User Account Control prompt, but clicking 'Yes' runs the process with that same account. That is a fail. The prompt must demand different credentials that the user does not hold.

The same logic applies to macOS users who are administrators of their own Mac: the password dialog appears, they type their own password, and the installer runs. Separation means the everyday account cannot elevate at all.

How do you pass Test 5?

  • Remove every daily-use account from the local Administrators group on Windows and from the admin group on macOS. Use a management tool to enforce it rather than relying on manual clean-up.
  • Create named administrator accounts for the people who need them (A7.5), used only for administrative tasks, and keep a register of who holds them (A7.8) with a periodic review (A7.9).
  • Where staff genuinely need to install software, use a privilege management tool or a self-service portal so elevation happens with a separate identity, not their own.
  • In cloud tenants, keep administrator roles on separate accounts from the accounts used for email, and require MFA on both.
  • Test it: log in as an ordinary user on each build and try to install something. If your own password gets you through, the device will fail.

How do assessors check this?

How assessors check this
Common failure: Local admin for convenience

Related pages

Frequently asked questions

Yes. The specification says all sampled devices need to be tested and the test case passes only if every sampled device passes.

Yes. The requirement is a separate account for administrative activities, so one person holds a standard account for email and browsing and an administrator account for admin work.

A privilege management tool that elevates through a separate identity with approval can pass, because the process does not run under the user's own account. Elevation that simply re-uses the user's password does not.

Yes, where administrative processes can run in the cloud environment. A normal user attempting an administrative action in the tenant must be refused or prompted for a separate privileged account.

Sampled phones and tablets are checked where an administrative process is possible, typically by confirming the management profile prevents the user changing protected settings.

Cyber Essentials Plus

Ready for the technical audit?

A 20-minute scoping call with an IASME-accredited assessor fixes your scope and device sample, then you get a written price from £3,000 + VAT within 48 hours and testing booked inside your three-month window.

  • IASME Certification Body
  • CREST accredited
  • UK offices in Leeds, Newcastle, London and Edinburgh
Sources