CE Plus · Test case 2

Cyber Essentials Plus Test 2: the authenticated patch scan

How the Cyber Essentials Plus authenticated vulnerability scan works on sampled devices, the three criteria that define a critical or high-risk vulnerability, the 14-day rule, and why virtual patching does not count.

By Precursor Security, an IASME Certification BodyUpdated 22 September 2026
Short answer

Test case 2 of Cyber Essentials Plus is an authenticated vulnerability scan of every sampled end user device, server and IaaS instance. It fails if any vulnerability rated critical or high risk by the vendor, scored CVSS v3 7 or above, or unrated, has had a vendor fix available for more than 14 days. Virtual patching is not accepted.

Key facts
Test purpose
Applies to
Fail criteria
Vulnerability fixes include
Not accepted
Control tested

What does Test 2 check?

Test 2 is the technical verification of the 14-day patching rule you declared in A6.4 and A6.5. The assessor runs a credentialed scan on each sampled device, so the scanner sees installed software versions and missing updates rather than only what is visible over the network.

Cyber Essentials Plus Test Specification v3.2

For each device to be tested, scan with the approved vulnerability scanning tool. Using the output of the scan, identify vulnerabilities that meet any of the three following criteria: described by the vendor as 'critical' or 'high risk'; has a CVSS v3 base score of 7 or above; there are no details of the level of vulnerabilities the update fixes provided by the vendor. If there are any vulnerabilities which meet the above criteria, and the vendor has provided a vulnerability fix which has been available for more than 14 days, record a Fail result for the sub-test. Otherwise, record a Pass result.

What counts as critical or high risk?

An update counts as critical or high risk if the vendor describes it that way, if it fixes a vulnerability with a CVSS v3 base score of 7 or above, or if the vendor gives no severity details at all.

Three criteria, and meeting any one of them is enough. The third is the one people miss: if the vendor publishes an update without saying what severity it fixes, the scheme treats it as if it were critical, and the 14-day clock runs from release.

CriterionExampleWithin 14 days?
Vendor describes it as critical or high riskMicrosoft 'Critical' rating on a monthly cumulative updateYes
CVSS v3 base score of 7.0 or aboveA browser update fixing a CVSS 8.8 remote code execution flawYes
Vendor gives no severityA printer driver or line-of-business tool update with no security advisoryYes
CVSS below 7 and vendor rates it moderate or lowA 5.3 information disclosureRecommended, not required

Why 14 days, and from when?

The 14 days run from the date the vendor releases the update, and the threshold is set by Requirements for IT Infrastructure v3.3.

The Requirements for IT Infrastructure v3.3 set the threshold: updates that fix critical or high-risk vulnerabilities, CVSS v3 7 or above, or unrated issues must be installed within 14 days of release. The NCSC notes that any longer would be a serious security risk and any shorter may not be practical. The clock starts when the vendor releases the fix, not when you notice it.

Where a vendor bundles several fixes of differing severity into one update, the whole update must be installed within 14 days if any of the issues inside it is critical or high. A monthly cumulative update almost always qualifies.

Automatic updates count, and the requirements say to enable them where possible. What the assessor sees in the scan is the outcome, so a device that has auto-update enabled but has not rebooted for six weeks will still fail.

Why is virtual patching not accepted?

The test specification states that virtual patching is not an acceptable long-term mitigation for legacy unsupported operating systems and is not recognised as a way to comply. The software must be updated, removed or moved out of scope.

Virtual patching means an intrusion prevention system or endpoint agent that blocks exploitation of a known vulnerability without the underlying software being fixed. It is sometimes offered as a way to keep an unsupported operating system in scope.

Cyber Essentials Plus Test Specification v3.2

Virtual patching is not an acceptable mitigation to the security vulnerabilities of legacy unsupported operating systems long term and so will not be recognised as a mechanism for compliance with Cyber Essential requirements.

  • An unsupported operating system on a sampled device fails Test 2 regardless of compensating controls, and it contradicts A6.1 and A6.3 on the self-assessment, where unsupported software means the licensed-and-supported requirement is not met.
  • The only route for software that must stay is the one in the requirements: move it into a sub-set that prevents all traffic to or from the internet (A6.7), so it is outside the boundary and is not sampled.

What happens if Test 2 fails?

Since April 2026, a failed update management test is remediated and retested on the original sample plus a new random sample. A second failure revokes the verified Cyber Essentials self-assessment certificate.

IASME added this rule in its April 2026 scheme update, under 'Verification of update management compliance', for assessment accounts created after 26 April 2026. It says some organisations had updated only the devices sampled for the audit. The new random sample at retest is there to catch exactly that.

In practice, treat a Test 2 finding as evidence about your update process, not about one device. Push the missing update to every device in scope, confirm compliance from your management console, and only then book the retest. The self-assessment answers to A6.4 and A6.5 cannot be changed once Plus testing has started.

How do you pass Test 2?

Patching is a common cause of first-attempt failures, and it is also the most predictable test case to prepare for.

  • Retire or isolate every unsupported operating system and application before the audit. Windows 10, older macOS releases and end-of-life browsers are the usual suspects.
  • Run your own authenticated scan with the same class of tool, at least two weeks before the audit, and fix everything rated high or critical.
  • Force reboots. Pending updates that are downloaded but not installed still show as missing.
  • Check third-party applications, not only the operating system: browsers, PDF readers, Java, Zoom, Teams, office suites and remote-access agents.
  • Check servers and IaaS instances the same way. They are in the sample and are often the least frequently rebooted.
  • Re-scan two or three days before the audit and keep the report as evidence for A6.4.2 and A6.5.2.

How do assessors check this?

How assessors check this
Common failure: Auto-update is on, the machine never restarted

Related pages

Frequently asked questions

Yes. It is an authenticated scan, so the tool logs in to the device or receives agent data and can see installed versions and missing updates. Have a credential or agent ready for each sampled platform.

Yes. The third criterion is that the vendor has provided no details of the severity. Such updates are treated as if they were critical and must be installed within 14 days.

It is inside the 14-day window and does not fail the sub-test. The assessor will note it, and you should install it before the window closes.

Not for the device in scope. The requirements say unsupported software must be removed or moved into a sub-set with no internet access. There is no risk-acceptance route within the boundary.

Sampled phones and tablets are checked for operating system version and update status; the method depends on the platform and the assessor's tooling. An unsupported iOS or Android version fails in the same way.

Not for compliance. The specification states that virtual patching will not be recognised as a mechanism for compliance with the requirements.

Under IASME's April 2026 rule, the original sample plus a new random sample from the wider environment. If the retest also fails, the verified self-assessment certificate is revoked.

Cyber Essentials Plus

Ready for the technical audit?

A 20-minute scoping call with an IASME-accredited assessor fixes your scope and device sample, then you get a written price from £3,000 + VAT within 48 hours and testing booked inside your three-month window.

  • IASME Certification Body
  • CREST accredited
  • UK offices in Leeds, Newcastle, London and Edinburgh
Sources